Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Abstrait

Review: Comparative Analysis of Nutrition Therapy and Dietary Recommendations

Robin Hood

Rather than receiving individualized nutrition therapy (INT), which is provided by a dietitian, many patients with type 2 diabetes receive dietary advice from nurses or doctors, despite recommendations to the contrary. We played out a meta-examination to look at the impact of INT that is furnished by an enlisted dietitian with the impact of dietary guidance that is given by other medical services experts. During this time, guidelines, reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the outcomes gyrated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, body mass index, and LDL cholesterol were the subject of a systematic review of the Cochrane library databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE. The guidelines for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were used to evaluate the evidence's quality and risk of bias. We found 5 RCTs with a total of 912 participants. In the principal year of mediation, nourishment treatment contrasted and dietary guidance was trailed by lower weight, what's more, lower LDL cholesterol. There were no longer-term data available. A portion of the included studies had a likely inclination, and hence, the nature of the proof was low or moderate. Furthermore, pooling essential and optional outcomes was vital.

Avertissement: Ce résumé a été traduit à l'aide d'outils d'intelligence artificielle et n'a pas encore été examiné ni vérifié.