Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Abstrait

Utilisation Of Hospital Emergency Departments As Suicide Prevention Sites: A Study Of Gaps In Suicide Assessment

Maina Rachel

BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments are underutilized settings for suicide prevention and management as patients with occult (camouflaged) suicides and suicidal ideation are rarely screened by nurses and other health workers in these sites. A majority of people who eventually complete suicide (up to one in every five and in other studies up to 83%) have been in contact with a health care professional prior to this occurrence. The aim of the study was to examine the current state of suicide assessment and management care at the Emergency Department, as well as, find out the perceived self-efficacy in suicide risk assessment, management and referral among nurses working in an emergency department within a lower income country. METHOD: The mixed methods descriptive study was conducted using key informant interviews with Accident and Emergency and Mental Health staff at Nairobi’s Kenyatta National Hospital. We interviewed eight key informants using a semi structured interview guide. Using NVivo Pro 11 software, themes and subthemes were derived. The Risk Assessment and Management Self-Efficacy Scale (RAMSES) was also administered among nurses in an emergency department (ED). The risk assessment, management and referral domains among 64 respondents were evaluated using mean and standard deviation calculations in SPSS v 21. RESULTS: The key themes derived from eight key informants’ responses included lack of patient suicide assessment, absence of holistic patient management as well as absence of existing protocol and care gaps and further recommendations. Six out of eight respondents shared that there were no assessment protocols. Psychological management was essentially an ex-post facto issue. The nurses had the least confidence in developing a written risk management plan 5.68 (SD 2.51) as well as using screening instruments to assess risk 5.90 (SD 2.15). FINDINGS: Our analyses led us to the conclusion that there were significant gaps in suicide assessment and management..