ISSN: 2157-2526

Journal de bioterrorisme et de biodéfense

Accès libre

Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Indexé dans
  • Indice source CAS (CASSI)
  • Index Copernic
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Roméo
  • Ouvrir la porte J
  • JournalSeek de génamique
  • Clés académiques
  • JournalTOC
  • RechercheBible
  • Infrastructure nationale du savoir de Chine (CNKI)
  • Annuaire des périodiques d'Ulrich
  • Recherche de référence
  • Université Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Catalogue en ligne SWB
  • Publons
  • Fondation genevoise pour l'enseignement et la recherche médicale
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Partager cette page

Abstrait

Predicting Radiation Doses Based on Time to Emesis in Nuclear Terrorism

Zubin Hilton

The standard mistake, certainty span, explicitness and awareness, and Collector Working Trademark bend are utilized to describe the vulnerability of the portion forecast. Using data on time to emesis, the dose prediction has a relative error of about 200%. Therefore, the 95% confidence interval is approximately if D is the dose assessment. In the event of a nuclear terrorism incident, our evaluation of the precision is used to calculate the probabilities for medical triage and management. A lack of consideration for individuals who do not vomit, differences between the conditions under which the data were obtained and the conditions under which they are likely to be used, and the potential for the incidence of vomiting to be altered by factors unrelated to radiation exposure such as psychogenic factors and the use of emetic agents are additional indicators that the utilization of time to emesis for triage presents additional challenges. In conclusion, while the time to emesis method is quick and inexpensive for estimating radiation dose, it should be used with caution due to its imprecision and the possibility of a high rate of false positives. More solid strategies for some time later appraisal of radiation portion are expected to supplement the utilization of time to emesis.