Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Indexé dans
  • Index Copernic
  • Google Scholar
  • Ouvrir la porte J
  • JournalSeek de génamique
  • Infrastructure nationale du savoir de Chine (CNKI)
  • Bibliothèque de revues électroniques
  • Recherche de référence
  • Université Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Bibliothèque virtuelle de biologie (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Fondation genevoise pour l'enseignement et la recherche médicale
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Partager cette page

Abstrait

Percutaneous Transesophageal Gastrostomy (Pteg): An Institutional Review and Largest Reported Case Series in the United States (U.S.)

Lisa Rotellini-Coltvet, Alex Wallace, Gia Saini, Sailendra Naidu, Scott Kriegshauser J, Indravadan Patel, Grace Knuttinen, Sadeer Alzubaidi, JenniferMarino, Rahmi Oklu

This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transesophageal Gastrostomy (PTEG) in patients with malignant bowel obstructions (MBO). To date, only small case series of PTEG have been published in the U.S. We aim to provide data via a review of PTEG indications, placements, and outcomes in what is the largest case series published in the U.S. A retrospective review of PTEG candidates in Arizona from 2014-2022. A total of 38 cases of PTEG procedures were included in the final data evaluation. The series included 19/38 (50%) male patients and 19/38 (50%). Three (8%) PTEG placements were performed without the use of anesthesia while the remainder (92%) were performed on patients under anesthesia. Clinical indication, method of placement, clinical outcome, mortality following placement and efficacy were evaluated. All PTEG placements were on the left side. All patients with successful PTEG placement experienced improved clinical symptoms. Technical success was achieved in 35/38 (92%) of patients. Overall, this large case series has proven that PTEG is a viable and durable option for patients with relative or absolute contraindications to traditional percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement for venting for MBO, proving itself to be an essential tool for oncology patients.