ISSN: 2155-6105

Journal de recherche et de thérapie en toxicomanie

Accès libre

Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Indexé dans
  • Indice source CAS (CASSI)
  • Index Copernic
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Roméo
  • Ouvrir la porte J
  • JournalSeek de génamique
  • Clés académiques
  • JournalTOC
  • SécuritéLit
  • Infrastructure nationale du savoir de Chine (CNKI)
  • Bibliothèque de revues électroniques
  • Recherche de référence
  • Université Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Catalogue en ligne SWB
  • Bibliothèque virtuelle de biologie (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Fondation genevoise pour l'enseignement et la recherche médicale
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Partager cette page

Abstrait

Peer Support for Opioid Use Disorders: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Moderated Text-Based Group Chat Application

Caroline R. Scherzer, Megan L. Ranney, John Patena, Ernestine Jennings, Kirsten J. Langdon, Francesca L. Beaudoin , Francesca L. Beaudoin

Purpose: To elucidate key elements surrounding acceptability/feasibility, usability, and features of a smartphone-based mobile peer support application for adults engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder.

Methods: We recruited adults engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder, during the course of usual care, at a hospital-affiliated outpatient clinic. Participants piloted a smartphone-based mobile peer support application for six weeks and completed semi-structured interviews exploring usability and acceptability of the mobile platform. Interviews were conducted by trained interviewers, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. A coding structure was iteratively developed using Framework Analysis focusing on feasibility and acceptability of the app and recommendations for improvement.

Results: Saturation was reached after 20 interviews (mean age 43.1; 60% white; 15% Hispanic/Latinx; 55% late in recovery; 55% high engagement users). Qualitatively, participants articulated (1) Acceptability/feasibility themes: benefits, challenges, feature recommendations; and (2) Emergent themes: support and alternative treatment option. Quantitative measures indicated feasibility with a total of 2,436 messages sent over the study period.

Conclusion: Adults engaged in medication for opioid use disorder expressed high degree of user satisfaction about a smartphone-based mobile peer support application. Incorporating thematic results on participants’ experiences and interactions with the peer support application and the application’s role in recovery efforts can inform development of future mobile-peer support applications for adults engaged in medication for opioid use disorder. Concerns about activity in peer support groups may be addressed through structured support from a moderator or designatedtimeframes to go online.