ISSN: 2475-3173

Cancer du col de l'utérus : accès libre

Accès libre

Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Abstrait

Patterns of Cervical Cancer Screening Follow-Up in the Period of Extended Screening Intervals

Charles Barkla

The implementation of extended screening intervals in cervical cancer screening programs has brought about significant changes in follow-up procedures for women with abnormal findings. This study aims to explore the patterns of cervical cancer screening follow-up during these extended intervals. Through the analysis of population-based data, including diverse demographic factors, the study investigates the timing and adherence to follow-up recommendations among women with abnormal screening results. The findings shed light on the factors influencing follow-up behaviors and provide insights for optimizing screening strategies and improving healthcare utilization in the context of extended screening intervals. Understanding these patterns can contribute to more effective and tailored cervical cancer screening programs. This study examines the patterns of cervical cancer screening follow-up in the context of extended screening intervals. With the introduction of more efficient and accurate screening methods, there has been a shift towards longer intervals between screenings. However, it is important to understand how women navigate follow-up procedures when abnormalities are detected during these extended intervals. The study analyses data from a diverse population to identify trends and factors influencing the timing and adherence to follow-up recommendations.