Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Abstrait

Neutrophil / Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) ? Trombocyte / Lymphocyte Ratio (TLR): A Predictor of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients?- Tugba Han Öner- Baskent University School of Medicine

Tugba Han Öner

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the
standard application for assessing axillary disease in

breast cancer patients. The Z0011 study by the Amer-
ican College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG)

emphasizes that axillary dissection (AD) is not re-
quired in selected patients with positive sentinel

lymph nodes (SLN) [1]. It is known that axillary lymph
node status is an important prognostic indicator in
patients with invasive breast cancer [2,3]. Sentinel
lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been reported to cause

fewer complications than axillary lymph node dissec-
tion (ALND), although extensive studies have shown

wound infection, seroma, hematoma, paresthesia,
and allergic reactions to isosulfan blue dye [4,5]. As
components of the systemic inflammatory response,

lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets are increas-
ingly accepted as playing an important role in car-
cinogenesis and tumor progression [6]. Neutrophil

/ lymphocyte ratio (NLR), trombocyte / lymphocyte

ratio (TLR) and Glasgow Prognostic Score are prog-
nostic markers in cancer [7]. High NLR (> 3.3) is asso-
ciated with larger tumors and later stages [8]. Simi-
larly, high TLR has been reported to adversely affect

survival in gastrointestinal cancers [9]. NLR and TLR
reflect systemic inflammation and have independent
prognostic value for various cancer patients [6,10].

However, the role of these biomarkers in breast can-
cer prognosis is less well known. Researchers have

questioned whether NLR and TLR help to predict the
axillary situation. This study therefore evaluated the

relationships between preoperative NLR, TLR, clini-
copathological factors, and axillary lymph node me-
tastasis in stage I-III breast cancer.

Patients and Methods: The study recruited 158 Stage

I-III breast cancer patients operated on at Baskent
University Zubeyde Hanim Research Center between

2011 and 2018. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and ax-
illary lymph node clearance in the presence of senti-
nel lymph node metastasis was performed on all the

patients. Their medical records were examined and

their medical history, age, radiological and patholog-
ical results, and laboratory data were collected. Pa-
tients who had received chemotherapy or received

immunosuppressive drugs, such as glucocorticoids,

cyclosporine, tacrolimus, or interferon, were exclud-
ed. The pathological data were analyzed and size of

tumor, histological grade, axillary lymph node status,
hormone receptor status, Cerb B2 status, presence
of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and Patients and

Methods perineural invasion (PNI), radiological re-
sults, and laboratory data were evaluated. Estrogen

receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status
were studied immunohistochemically (IHC). Venous
blood samples were taken just before surgery. The

ratio of neutrophil and trombocyte count to lympho-
cyte count, and NLR cut-off values were calculated

for both 3.5 and 1.
Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using SPPS
25 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics
for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Mean ± standard deviation, percentage and frequen-
cy values of the variables were used. Variables were

evaluated after checking for normality and homoge-
neity of variances (Shapiro Wilk and Levene Test).

The analysis showed that the prerequisites for inde-
pendent 2-group t test (Student’s t test) where not

met, so Mann Whitney-U test was used to compare
the two groups. Categorical data were analyzed

Avertissement: Ce résumé a été traduit à l'aide d'outils d'intelligence artificielle et n'a pas encore été examiné ni vérifié.