Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.
Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs
Adams K, Hansmann A, Bosanac D, Peddu P, Ryan S and Papagrigoriadis S
Objective: As colorectal anastomotic leaks (AL) often present with non-specific clinical features, Computed Tomography (CT) scans are commonly used to aid in diagnosis. Aim was to define radiologist reported features in CT scans following colorectal resection as diagnostic factors for clinical AL detection.
Methods: Consecutive patients identified with a clinically confirmed post-operative AL. Control group (matched 2:1 ratio) selected from patients who were scanned with a clinical suspicion of an AL, though eventually disproved and who did not require re-operation. Four gastrointestinal radiologists reviewed CT scans, blinded to clinical outcome. Radiologists assessed for the overall impression of a radiological AL and presence of the adjunct leak features. A leak prediction model was constructed with multivariate logistic regression with outcome classified as clinical AL.
Results: 18 patients with confirmed AL, 36 matched control patients. No significant difference in the sensitivity/specificity between the radiologists in accuracy of leak detection, with overall correct diagnosis of clinical AL 81.4%. Radiological Leak, abnormal bowel wall appearance and ileus were significant predictors (P<0.05) within regression model. The prediction model produced an overall sensitivity 85.2%, specificity 80.2% and ROC curve area of 87.3%.
Conclusion: Individual radiologist reported CT features have been used to create a risk prediction model that improves diagnostic accuracy of AL over general radiological impression alone.