Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Abstrait

Can Plants Genomes be Edited Using the Current gRNA Ranking Prediction Algorithms?

Fatima Sheikh

Conventional breeding often requires decades to introduce a new feature into a crop, but recently developed genome sequence modification technology offers the potential to shorten this time. One of these cutting-edge breeding techniques uses CRISPR/Cas9, an RNA-directed DNA nuclease, to cut the genomic DNA in living organisms, making it easier to delete or insert sequences. Guide RNAs control this targeting based on certain sequences (gRNAs) [1]. But selecting the best gRNA sequence is not without its difficulties. Although many of them allow the use of plant genomes to identify potential off-target regions, almost all of the current gRNA design tools for usage in plants are based on data from animal experimentation. Here, we analyse the performance and predicted consistency of eight various online gRNA-site tools. Unfortunately, neither a statistically meaningful association between rankings and in vivo effectiveness, nor any agreement between the rankings produced by the various
algorithms. This indicates that significant gRNA performance and/or target site accessibility aspects in plants have not yet been clarified and taken into account by gRNA-site prediction algorithms [2].

Avertissement: Ce résumé a été traduit à l'aide d'outils d'intelligence artificielle et n'a pas encore été examiné ni vérifié.