ISSN: 2157-2526

Journal de bioterrorisme et de biodéfense

Accès libre

Notre groupe organise plus de 3 000 séries de conférences Événements chaque année aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Europe. Asie avec le soutien de 1 000 autres Sociétés scientifiques et publie plus de 700 Open Access Revues qui contiennent plus de 50 000 personnalités éminentes, des scientifiques réputés en tant que membres du comité de rédaction.

Les revues en libre accès gagnent plus de lecteurs et de citations
700 revues et 15 000 000 de lecteurs Chaque revue attire plus de 25 000 lecteurs

Indexé dans
  • Indice source CAS (CASSI)
  • Index Copernic
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Roméo
  • Ouvrir la porte J
  • JournalSeek de génamique
  • Clés académiques
  • JournalTOC
  • RechercheBible
  • Infrastructure nationale du savoir de Chine (CNKI)
  • Annuaire des périodiques d'Ulrich
  • Recherche de référence
  • Université Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Catalogue en ligne SWB
  • Publons
  • Fondation genevoise pour l'enseignement et la recherche médicale
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Partager cette page

Abstrait

Bioterrorism agents and transport mechanism

Alex Xavier

The bioterrorism information element of the questionnaire consisted of 38 real or false items, with one point presented for each correct solution; better ratings indicated higher know-how levels. The maximum feasible score for bioterrorism. Moreover, 12 more than one desire knowledge-based questions with a single accurate answer that was really worth 1 point have been added from a have a look at performed via Katz et al. The questions concentrated on bioterrorism dealers, syndromic surveillance, and the popularity of ailment manifestations of CDC “category A” dealers to evaluate fundamental standards in bioterrorism and clinical shows of bioterrorism marketers, with extra questions especially associated with the identity of smallpox and anthrax and manage measures for smallpox. Survey questions regarding the perceived benefits of bioterrorism preparedness schooling and barriers were primarily based on a five-point Like rt-type scale (strongly agree, agree, impartial, disagree, and strongly disagree)scores of the gain and barrier objects had been summed to offer overall ratings for the blessings and limitations subscales. Higher rankings on these subscales indicated a better perceived advantage of receiving schooling (maximum score: 30) or a better number of perceived barriers to education participation (maximum score: 70). The tool assessed bioterrorism schooling and reaction via asking the look at individuals about the following: (i) previous bioterrorism preparedness schooling and the regions that they want training in; and (ii) if the respondent could be inclined to help the institution in its bioterrorism reaction and control efforts.